Forum

New Expert-level Ta...
 
Notifications
Clear all

New Expert-level Tables

15 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
642 Views
Josh
 Josh
(@Josh-71)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 60
Topic starter  

Based on recent feedback, there will be a new Pinochle release coming out soon introducing Expert tables. The Android release should start rolling out tonight and the Apple update will hopefully come out over the weekend.

The Expert tables will be exclusive for players with a rating of 100 or higher, and players with a high rate of abandoning games will be ineligible. The goal of this is to incentivize better game play and discourage people from abandoning games. We want to create a better experience for serious players but still welcome newcomers and encourage new players to earn their way up towards the expert level.

These changes are experimental and may require some tweaking as everyone adapts. This may result in slightly longer wait times as our players will now be divided between more tables. Hopefully, we can quickly balance this out.

If these changes are effective we will follow suit for the Cutthroat tables as well in the near future.

Please share feedback, or any questions or concerns.


   
Quote
Moon
 Moon
(@Moon-3161)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 4
 

How do you get back eligible? Several of my abandoned games were completly unitentional.
Moon


   
ReplyQuote
Josh
 Josh
(@Josh-71)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 60
Topic starter  

@Moon Please try back in a couple days. It's based on frequency of recent penalties but will reset after a few days if no more instances.


   
ReplyQuote
Moon
 Moon
(@Moon-3161)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 4
 

@Josh it's been 4 days now?


   
ReplyQuote
Moon
 Moon
(@Moon-3161)
New Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 4
 

It's been 4 days now.


   
ReplyQuote
Im Batman
(@Im-Batman-1245)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 89
 

@Josh
@Moon
What calendar do y'all operate and live off?...lol. Date of your two correspondences show in the months of July & August of 2024 but today is only Friday, May 24th, 2024.

Also, I cannot keep quiet any longer regarding this "Expert Table" and "Penalty" system it now contains for leaving games early whether the reasons are any of the following:
A) Intentional Quit
B) Unintentional - game server drops us
C) Unintentional - game freezes bringing in A.I.s
D) Unintentional - phone battery dies or power out
E) Unintentional - player's network carrier drop

I feel it is unfair to saddle a player with a ban on playing because any combination of the possibilities I listed above will land you in hot water. I have been banned from playing on the "Single Deck Expert Table" because of a combination of enough of the above shown causes of dropping out of a game.

The last cause, I will admit honestly, was in me quitting on a partner who is not of "expert" level and I did not want them to have the satisfaction of performing the idiotic performance they were doing on purpose. In fact, Josh although you mentioned that early on this low rating of 100 equating to being an "expert" was to soften the sudden changes to the overall systems and player perceptions of letting this idea take root.

In reality, after a minimal amount of games under their belt a brand new player can easily fit in to either table category of "Expert" or just Standard. Basically, there is no expert area or arena still for real players to play in and seek out serious good talent and game play. We are still burdened with the new or the needy or the bizarre or the stinky.

The idiocy I dropped out on recently that I guess tipped me in to being banned is having a partner who bids on round as well but bidding after me. Only one player of the competition is bidding right along from the start too. I had been dealt cards that were better than the garbage anomaly that has hit again recently where ALMOST ALL HANDS cannot be bid on or rarely matched up with your partner to create any resemblance of meld in either hand. So I continue to bid especially since I was the lead bidder. My partner was bidding right along after me but never signalled an increase of +2 in the bid to indicate to partnership that he was taking over. And although the competitor kept on bidding along too the number was getting high and I could not shake off my partner off MY "bid first" bid with no request take-over bump up bid by them. I did the team thing and dropped my bidding to the STUBBORN partner so the bid number would not be totally out of reach. But this rank newby, mind you.. who is bidding right after, drops the bid right away too!!! Well, WTH? WHY??? Why keep bidding over me only to drop the bid after I did the sensible thing a bowed out before number got too high? I would have stayed in if they were dropping and if they were dropping then why hound me and keep bidding over me?

EXPERT? Hell. No. This is only a small sample of the idiocy we put up with...
But don't confuse this with there are genuine new players that just need some coaching and some situational explaining done wherein they would be much better players. Right now I am ranting about the players who are allowed to play in the "Expert Table" level but have win-loss records that are ridiculously slumped in to the loss column by hundreds... If not thousands!!! That player I abandoned recently for their obvious ignorant play had a record of playing hundred and hundreds of games but guess what the majority of them were...

Maybe a more fair and accurate view of the older established players with extensive records is to revamp the rating system to evaluate their performance on the last 50 or 100 games. Then a player, whether noob or existing, would have to legitimately qualify for the Expert Table. Right now a player can amass a ranking of 100 to qualify to play up to Expert but so many of them are no more expert than ...(biting my tongue). Again, in other words, there are two table choices that have extremely similar players whether you just started today after going thru the tutorial or have an overall records of a few thousand total games with two-thirds of them as losses. Neither one to me is an expert yet both can practically play on either table now (give the noob a week to amass the 100 points).

So here I am banned for quitting on a creepy player that doesn't deserve to play in the expert table with the kind of play they perform (there was more to them). Part of my ban is from the game app freezing when someone quits and it tries to bring in an A.I. bot but sometimes gets hung up.

Ironically, though I was banned for quitting on the horrible play of that player...I can still play on the "Standard" table that has players with possible lower ranks and maybe unintentionally worse play.

BTW...
Since the advent of the new Expert 100 table I have seen a lot of new names I never saw before but I have noticed that there are some missing good high level players who used to be around all the time yet I don't see them any more.


   
ReplyQuote
Josh
 Josh
(@Josh-71)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 60
Topic starter  

@Mike-Ox-Big

Fixed the date format...it was showing day/month instead of month/day 🙂

Anyway...good points. The ban for too many penalties is temporary and will be lifted after a few days. I will consider scaling this back a little perhaps.

I will also think about long term ways to discern different scenarios for how/why someone was removed from the game and consider different penalties depending on the circumstance.

The biggest problem I think is people who start a game, get upset because they're losing (either because they got bad cards or they overbid) and they abandon the game without finishing. The penalty system is primarily intended to discourage this type of behavior. I appreciate other circumstances that are not intentional, but these too contribute to a poorer game experience for the remaining players. If someone has a bad internet connection or an older phone, I understand this may not be intentional, but it's nonetheless annoying for the other players if they drop out in the middle of the game.

I also admit that sometimes people are getting penalized/removed because of errors in the app or network errors. I'm focused right now on finding these errors and weeding them out and will see if there's ways to prevent these cases from getting counted as a penalty.

However, about 90% of the problems are related to people dropping out in the middle of the game. The system tries to replace people with a robot but there's a lot of problems right now with the timing of this if it happens at the same time they system is updating. Hopefully, this can be improved so at least if someone does drop out the remaining players can finish and won't experience subsequent errors.

Longer term, I want to do a lot more with the friends system, to allow people to schedule games with players they know, see who's online and invite people to join a table, etc. and add more chat/messaging. I have a roadmap to get there over the summer but for now am focused on reducing errors and will take a look at some tweaks to the penalty system.


   
ReplyQuote
Im Batman
(@Im-Batman-1245)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 89
 

@Josh
Thanks for the quick responses.

What did you think of my idea regarding evaluating a player's performance on their most recent 50 games and keep that as a sliding evaluation view. This may at first penalize some players who have been here for a while but if they have records of (hypothetically):
137 wins / 411 losses for 548 games total (25%) then at first glance in no way should they be allowed to play up at Expert Table. But what if they have finally turned the corner? ...The lightbulb has been lit overhead...
What if the last 50 games of that somewhat ugly record this player went 39 wins / 11 losses for their most recent 50 games (78%) ??

And maybe the threshold Expert Table is 75% winning record for your 50 game (or 100 game) sliding assessment...

This would give many of the old players something to achieve instead of a free ride to create the following:
1) We want ALL players to experience a satisfyingly good time in a positive manner.
2) The achievement of #1 should not be at the expense of directly or indirectly harming the play of others. Now I don't mean that handing someone a loss in the loss column qualifies as a "harm" or avoidable "bad experience". It is a game, after all, and players should expect to win and/or lose. I am referring to the horrible or bad experience the very good and expert players are still subjected to as well. Just as you pointed out that the player's experience is not fun and being harmed by all these games having players drop....for whatever reasons...there exists many reasons for the experienced players to have a really bad time too. Please put our shoes on and walk a mile to see our view too.

As disappointing, aggravating, disturbing are the quitting / dropping players there is a whole world of frustration for the real "expert table" players. We are saddled quite frequently with players that have been playing for quite some time that still:
A) Don't know what's best to pass especially if they don't have any of the called trump suit.
B) are rarely creative with regards to making meld happen in their hand or their partner's hand via the 4 card pass.
C) Either don't know which cards designate the "point cards" or don't know they should point throw the right cards to their partner as play goes on and the books develop.
D) Either will not or do not count how many trump cards have been played so they know how many are left.
E) Play cards out of hierarchy designations that obviously mess up the game info their partner is watching as game develops.
F);Pass you back Aces you send them for what reason still escapes me. Aces not sent back to cover low cards they may need to keep. They send back Aces to void them of that suit wherein I have seen several times now ruining 4-of-kind Aces...!!
G) Many, many more...etc. etc. but could take all night.

Now, again, these numbered comments immediately above are not about the new player who is learning the game and may lack many strategies or needs refining. I refer to having to play with partners who have so many games under their belt that they should definitely know better. In conclusion, that is just as bad but probably worse experiences for the very good players than the players who have to endure someone who quits a game or game server / their ISP drops.

The sliding most recent 50 or 100 game window would fast track the project and opportunity for defining areas or levels of:
1) Expert Table
2) Standard Table
3) Newbie Table.

And if there was some way to deter the potty mouths or the vilifiers from using a "Chat" feature in a negative way...we could teach and/or suggest so much to the newer players to refine their skills fast track.

Please let me know about these items and ideas I wrote about, Josh.
After all...I'm banned for quitting because of my bad experience caused I think directly by another....and I can't play my favorite Expert Table now...lol


   
ReplyQuote
Josh
 Josh
(@Josh-71)
Member Admin
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 60
Topic starter  

@Mike-Ox-Big Thanks for the suggestions. I definitely like the idea of basing a rating on recent performance over the last 50 games. I also like the idea of eventually having 3 tiers instead of just 2, although not sure if there are enough players at each of the tiers to support it just yet. We have been seeing some modest but steady growth in recent months so maybe we can get there by the summer.


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

Why is this happening to me all of the time?? I will be first in line in the waiting room and 3 or 4 other players come in and knock me out and they play and i go back in the Q???


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

why if you have someone blocked they still play with you??? Also i have been playing with a lot of people that are lower scores like me and the other team out rates us by over 1000 sometimes?? I thought it tried to make it even
???


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

ok wow how did this happen AGAIN ???I am in the waiting room 4 players come up and the 2 lowest players get matched up together. myself 769 and partner 299 opponents 1741 and 302 What the heck??? most of the time yo
u just wait until you are more evenly matched.


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

OMG it just happened AGAIN 2 of the lowest players had to play together. What is going on????


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

OK this is CRAZY EVERYTIME i play now i am with the lower score like myself and play against usually more than 1000 points more than us. Can you PLEASE fix this


   
ReplyQuote
Terber
(@Terber-4033)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
 

should be marked with a win, message SORRY GAME ENDED

This post was modified 6 months ago by Terber

   
ReplyQuote
Share:

Online Now

  • Joe

    Rating 7029
  • Liz

    Rating 1733
  • Tac

    Rating 1275
  • Spankyspence

    Rating 1207
  • craig

    Rating 1639
  • Cafrha

    Rating 228
  • ATrain

    Rating 1148
  • Meld First

    Rating 2227
  • Bolger

    Rating 3346
  • traunch

    Rating 832
  • Jim

    Rating 1414
  • brock

    Rating 2042
  • Snoman

    Rating 1886
  • snake

    Rating 1618
  • JodyBro

    Rating 1250
  • tech

    Rating 1394
  • Angel

    Rating 1219
  • Big Dill

    Rating 3122
  • geralt

    Rating 1241
  • felix

    Rating 1158
  • StillTraveler

    Rating 1521
  • lynn

    Rating 1271
  • rednuts

    Rating 1082
  • melody

    Rating 1954
  • Virginia

    Rating 1465
  • nurse

    Rating 1768
  • Hasan

    Rating 1000
  • Brady

    Rating 7755
  • Mkd

    Rating 1543
  • fred

    Rating 801
  • Gator

    Rating 2356
  • Saris

    Rating 1702
  • MTG

    Rating 1643
  • james

    Rating 450
  • Ernie

    Rating 23811
  • tamara

    Rating 1216
  • Jenny

    Rating 144
  • BeerNGuns

    Rating 975
  • Jay

    Rating 1294
  • dell

    Rating 1152
  • jenna

    Rating 1563
  • KristenG

    Rating 1690
  • Sir

    Rating 1384
  • ozone

    Rating 1454
  • kismet

    Rating 1277
  • Travis

    Rating 971
  • Buckeye

    Rating 1959
  • Hunter

    Rating 1773
  • marley420

    Rating 1151
  • Skw

    Rating 1460
  • Char

    Rating 0
  • Mark

    Rating 6352
  • SpecialMom

    Rating 1424
  • Mono

    Rating 1323
  • Nick

    Rating 1339
  • Jenn

    Rating 1677
  • Dee

    Rating 547
  • rip

    Rating 880
  • Bryan

    Rating 47
  • dwinkler

    Rating 819
  • Brian

    Rating 1429
  • Lucy

    Rating 1264
  • Darrin

    Rating 527
  • Zoogod

    Rating 1323
  • Walk

    Rating 782
  • broke

    Rating 628
  • Phillips

    Rating 945
  • Sadzapp

    Rating 93
  • starkey

    Rating 1278
  • Karen

    Rating 994
  • Bossman

    Rating 1006
  • Edie

    Rating 2064
  • Stl

    Rating 713
  • BigE

    Rating 1934
  • jr

    Rating 1877
  • rebecca

    Rating 1543
  • S Klump

    Rating 405
  • RB

    Rating 1361
  • Paylane

    Rating 1483
  • Bosshoggjay

    Rating 69
  • Traceyad

    Rating 1328
  • mich

    Rating 331
  • Maryvale

    Rating 1372
  • Mona

    Rating 1303
  • Player Mary

    Rating 179
  • Clyde

    Rating 1109
  • Kroll

    Rating 1496
  • Brandi

    Rating 413
  • Durham

    Rating 1651
  • bob

    Rating 1393
  • Daenerys

    Rating 1446
  • Karina

    Rating 1349
  • Bigrome

    Rating 1446
  • andy

    Rating 1035
  • Arbek

    Rating 766
  • E

    Rating 1278
  • Owen

    Rating 1085
  • Nodak Sparky

    Rating 54
  • Betimgood

    Rating 592
  • Codo

    Rating 1434
  • ecker

    Rating 802
  • Jodie

    Rating 838
  • Tyana

    Rating 1697
  • Terry

    Rating 1255
  • Jewlz

    Rating 426
  • Ricky

    Rating 413
  • James

    Rating 3989
  • saddie

    Rating 748
  • Baybroant

    Rating 536
  • wots

    Rating 1492
  • karl

    Rating 908
  • matt

    Rating 1496
  • ryan

    Rating 1676
  • cal

    Rating 1614
  • jimmy

    Rating 1131
  • Mary

    Rating 4863
  • tami

    Rating 1008
  • Lenhoj

    Rating 1701
  • mrsmith

    Rating 1118
  • Pj

    Rating 991
  • Tynitty

    Rating 1066
  • megha

    Rating 1069
  • worm

    Rating 1791
  • Zack

    Rating 2201
  • Decibel

    Rating 888
  • annie

    Rating 1227
  • Ricardo

    Rating 1274
  • Tim

    Rating 947
  • nan

    Rating 1291
  • CaseyPie

    Rating 813
  • Reyes

    Rating 1328
  • thedon

    Rating 1522
  • Karen

    Rating 1509
  • shwam

    Rating 1408
  • Lisa

    Rating 2268
  • John J

    Rating 1941
  • Andy

    Rating 93
  • trolly

    Rating 1236
  • arnold

    Rating 1071
  • Hick

    Rating 1289
  • Mark

    Rating 1754
  • FOoCheezeMo

    Rating 176
  • Guerro

    Rating 682
  • quatto

    Rating 1389
  • Deniz

    Rating 1362
  • Andrea

    Rating 1093
  • Dylan

    Rating 609
  • Trenton

    Rating 1166
  • The Best

    Rating 225
  • buzz

    Rating 1101
  • Dan

    Rating 1307
  • Tom

    Rating 701
  • jackie

    Rating 1165
  • Haven

    Rating 880
  • win

    Rating 1494
  • donald

    Rating 799
  • Frank

    Rating 1318
  • ramsey

    Rating 1187
  • mjb

    Rating 1612
  • Omarcillo

    Rating 1256
  • Grandma

    Rating 717
  • Lisa

    Rating 1116
  • Tommie

    Rating 1508
  • Crowley

    Rating 779
  • Frank

    Rating 2318
  • Elkhntr

    Rating 356

Today's Best Hand

Lisa

Double Deck Cutthroat
King of HeartsQueen of HeartsKing of ClubsQueen of ClubsAce of DiamondsAce of DiamondsAce of SpadesAce of SpadesAce of HeartsAce of HeartsAce of ClubsAce of ClubsQueen of DiamondsQueen of SpadesTen of DiamondsTen of DiamondsKing of DiamondsKing of DiamondsQueen of DiamondsJack of DiamondsJack of Diamonds
  • Ernie

    Rating 23811
  • John

    Rating 8653
  • Brady

    Rating 7755
  • Player

    Rating 7687
  • Dave T

    Rating 7165
  • Joe

    Rating 7029
  • Otto

    Rating 6912
  • Myongpun

    Rating 6449
  • Mark

    Rating 6352
  • Dakota

    Rating 5524